Ongoing Debate of Gender Issues in Education

A Study of Gender Issues in Education

| Introduction | Gender Issues Concept Map | Historical Overview | Legal Overview | Pedagogical Overview | The Gender Debate | Resources

Arguments for and against Single-Sex Schooling

  • The consequences of single-sex education are vastly debated and vary quite a bit, but the pros and cons of this issue can be broken down into a few key points.

 

  • Benefits of Single-Sex:
  • A non-gender biased environment, academic advantages, and a comfortable learning environment are three of the most distinct benefits.
  • Right around the age of puberty, the abilities of boys and girls change in the classroom, and by the time students graduate high school the gap between boys’ and girls’ abilities is even greater.
  • The comfort benefits of single-sex education are endless. Students can focus on school rather than their hormones. (Sadker & Zittleman, 2001, p.151) Neither sex is afraid to make mistakes or stand out in the classroom because they are not trying to impress the opposite sex. Adolescent girls generally have lower self-esteem than adolescent boys, and a single-sex environment helps to not pit girls against girls. On the contrary, single-sex education encourages bonding and support. The academic and personal advantages of single-sex education are clear, but there are also a few cons to this type of environment.

 

  • Arguments against Single-Sex:
  •  The main concern pending single-sex education is that students do not learn how to function in a coed environment. Once they attend a coed college, they will be less likely to adapt to the coed classroom. Some argue that learning should teach about the real world, and in the real world males and females need to learn to coexist.

  • Single-sex high school students may miss out on the traditional high school experience. Sports are different, homecomings, and everyday life is very different for those in a single-sex high school. While different does not necessarily mean better or worse, students may feel that they missed out on the traditional high school experience.

  • Perhaps teaching males and females differently simply reinforces the stereotypes that already exist. It is then also unfair to claim that any single group can be defined by such limitations. It is very difficult to claim that all females should be learning one way when males should learn another; it is similar to classifying groups based on color.

  • Lastly, most single-sex high schools are private schools. This generally means that those whom attend these schools are of high income, which means a lack of diversity. Although scholarship programs exist, for the most part, there is a lack of economic diversity within these schools.